. I found myself struggling with
being able to follow and understand Dennis Baron’s article,” From Pencils to
Pixels: The Stages of Literacy Technologies”, more than others we have
read. From what I did understand, I
would say that I am mostly indifferent about his arguments. I think that throughout the piece Baron
definitely “shrugs” at technology but at the same time talks fondly of it. In the beginning he mentions how technology
has come to influence his literacy knowledge, but then there are also parts
where he emphasizes the flaws of technology.
One thing that I noticed in particular, which has me leaning more
towards disagreeing with the prompt, is that I often notice Baron mocking, by
using humor, the traditional methods of writing. When speaking of early writers, Baron jokes by
saying, “Surely the walked around all day with a bunch of sharp styluses
sticking out of their pocket protectors, and talked of nothing but new ways of
making marks on stones” (WAW 427). This
leads to me to believe that Baron is not someone who thinks that only the
traditional methods are the best. In
fact, I think that he just might believe that new technologies are fundamentally
changing the shape and nature of writing all the time. He spends a lot of time in his article
talking about the way new technology is always influencing literacy and I would
say that he almost speaks well of it just as often as he shrugs at it.
No comments:
Post a Comment