In Barbara
Tomlinson’s piece, “Tuning, Tying, and Training Texts” she explains eight
different metaphors that relate to how an author revises their writing. I found
myself being able to relate to a handful of the metaphors but for this post I
chose to discuss Casting and Recasting, Sculpting, and Painting. I related to
Casting and Recasting in the way that I sometimes change important aspects of
my writings similar to recasting new lead roles. By important aspects I mean
things like my introduction or synopsis or things that really stand out to the
reader. I found Sculpting and Painting to be things that I relate to with my
more of my works than Casting and Recasting. When I being drafting what I try
to do is write absolutely every idea I have down however sloppy it may look.
Once that is finished, I go through and make the big changes like deleting
unneeded paragraphs. Then I go back through and make smaller, finer changes
such as changing sentence structure and grammatical errors. That process to me
is what I took to be Sculpting. I took
Painting to be something that is similar to Sculpting but more of a “building
up” process than a “breaking down”. When
relating painting to my works, I find it to be the process where I go through
several times and add layers of information where I feel it is missing. I found
Tomlinson’s piece to be an interesting look at the way people revise.
In terms of
Wikipedia, the history and discussion tabs are two that definitely give an
author or editor ideas or guidance with revising. With “View History”, one can
look back and see the types of edits that have been made to the piece. This
could help by allowing someone to see what others did to change the article and
it could spark ideas. With “Discussion”, one can see what is acceptable and
what is expected by the editors of the site and that could help shape what
information a writer could use and how they could present it.
No comments:
Post a Comment